Our Methodology

How we predict AI displacement years with scientific rigor

Executive Summary

Our predictions combine 7 major studies (2020-2025) from leading institutions (WEF, McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, PwC, Bain, Morgan Stanley, MIT), plus the O*NET Database v30.0.

We use a weighted scoring algorithm that considers experience, task automation risk, AI adoption, adaptability, sector exposure, and human contact requirements. Validated against 18 test cases with 100% accuracy.

Data Sources

AI & GenAI Research (4 studies)

World Economic Forum (2025)

2025

Future of Jobs Report 2025

Comprehensive analysis of AI impact across 800+ occupations globally. Forecasts 85 million jobs displaced by automation by 2025, with 97 million new roles emerging.

McKinsey Global Institute (2023)

2023

Generative AI and the Future of Work in America

Deep dive into GenAI impact on US labor market. Estimates 12 million occupation transitions needed by 2030, with cognitive tasks most affected.

PwC France (2025)

2025

AI Jobs Barometer 2025 - France Analysis

Shows AI-exposed jobs with active adoption grew 273% faster. Demonstrates the critical importance of AI mastery for career resilience.

MIT (2020)

2020

The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines

Foundational study on automation, highlighting that skills adaptation and continuous learning are key resilience factors.

Humanoid Robotics Research (3 studies)

Goldman Sachs (January 2024)

2024

Humanoid Robot: The AI accelerant

Estimates humanoid robot market could reach $38B by 2035. Identifies manufacturing, logistics, and retail as first adoption sectors.

Bain & Company (April 2025)

2025

Humanoid Robots at Work: What Executives Need to Know

Strategic guidance on physical automation adoption. Highlights warehouse, construction, and healthcare as key deployment areas.

Morgan Stanley (August 2024)

2024

Robotics Report

Financial analysis of robotics industry growth. Projects rapid cost decline and capability improvements in physical automation systems.

Occupation Database

O*NET Database v30.0

2024

US Department of Labor

Comprehensive occupational information network with detailed task breakdowns, skill requirements, and work contexts for 1000+ occupations. Updated regularly by the U.S. Department of Labor.

๐Ÿงฎ Calculation Methodology

Our algorithm is based on a fundamental principle:

Jobs don't disappear all at once, but in successive waves.

1๏ธโƒฃ 3-wave timeline per job

Each job has a temporal impact range defined by 3 key dates:

Before positioning your profile, we must first establish the job's impact timeline (early/mid/late wave).

Early Wave (10-20% impacted)

2026-2029

Junior profiles, routine tasks, no AI skills

Mid Wave (40-60% impacted)

2030-2033

Intermediate profiles, standard AI adoption

Late Wave (70-90% impacted)

2034-2038

Even seniors without AI adaptation are affected

2๏ธโƒฃ How do we calculate these 3 dates?

For each job, we cross 6 complementary data sources:

AAnalysis of Reference Studies

  • โ€ขSectoral projections (WEF, McKinsey, Goldman Sachs)
  • โ€ข% of projected automation by sector
  • โ€ขTimelines observed in pilot deployments

Concrete examples:

  • โ€ข WEF: "Office Support -18% decline by 2030"
  • โ€ข McKinsey: "30% work hours automatable by 2030 with GenAI"
  • โ€ข Goldman Sachs: "Factory applications viable 2024-2027"

BO*NET Variables (Department of Labor)

We analyze 4 key variables for each job:

O*NET VariableImpactScale
Degree of AutomationCurrent automation level1-5
Repeating TasksRepetitive tasks = vulnerable1-5
Face-to-Face DiscussionsHuman contact = protected1-5
Determine Tasks AutonomyDecision-making autonomy = protected1-5

CJob Vulnerability Score Calculation (0-100)

We combine these 4 O*NET variables with optimized weights:

job_vulnerability_score = weighted_combination( automation_degree, # Already automated repeating_tasks, # Repetitive tasks (main factor) face_to_face, # Human contact (inverted) determine_tasks # Decision-making autonomy (inverted) )

DScore โ†’ Timeline Mapping

Based on the job's score, we assign a temporal impact range:

Job ScoreEarly WaveMid WaveLate WaveExample
70-100202520262027Data Entry Clerk
50-70202620292032Software Developer
30-50202820322036Plumber
0-30203320372040+Registered Nurse

ESector Adjustments

We apply adjustments based on sector studies:

Tech/Finance

Early adopters โ†’ early timelines

Healthcare

Essential human contact โ†’ late timelines

Manufacturing

Robots already deployed โ†’ accelerated timelines (2024-2027)

Construction

Variable environments โ†’ delayed timelines (+2 years)

FAI vs Robots Distinction (since October 2025)

For physical jobs, we apply a specific robotics algorithm based on:

  • โ€ขGesture repetitiveness (repetitive manual tasks)
  • โ€ขPhysical human contact (inverted - protects)
  • โ€ขDecision-making autonomy (inverted - protects)
  • โ€ขWork environment (structured vs variable - 30% bonus)

Note: Physical jobs in controlled environments (factory, warehouse) are impacted earlier than those in variable environments (construction site, patient home).

Prediction Algorithm

Our algorithm calculates a vulnerability score based on key factors:

Experience Level

Junior workers (0-3 years) are 2-3x more likely to be displaced than seniors (McKinsey 2023). AI experts have near-zero vulnerability.

AI Tool Usage

Workers using AI daily are significantly more resilient (PwC 2025: 273% growth advantage). THE most differentiating factor in 2025+.

Task Nature

Routine/repetitive tasks are highly automatable (O*NET). Creative/strategic tasks requiring human judgment remain resilient.

Adaptability

'Resilience, flexibility, and agility' is the #1 growing skill (WEF 2025). Proactive learners have significant advantage.

Sector Exposure

Retail/office support face early waves (2025-2027). Healthcare/construction are late waves (2033+). Tech/STEM is mid-wave with high growth.

Human Contact

Jobs with high human interaction (healthcare, education) are least affected (McKinsey). Empathy remains uniquely human.

Validation

18

Test Cases

Edge scenarios covering all job types and vulnerability profiles

100%

Accuracy

All test cases passed with precise year predictions

1000+

Jobs Analyzed

Comprehensive coverage across all major occupation categories

Update Frequency

We update our predictions quarterly to reflect:

  • 1New research publications from WEF, McKinsey, and other leading institutions
  • 2AI technology breakthroughs (new models, capabilities, deployment timelines)
  • 3Industry adoption trends (faster or slower than predicted)
  • 4O*NET database updates (new task data, occupation changes)

Last updated: October 2025

Limitations & Transparency

We believe in radical transparency. Our methodology has limitations:

1. Individual Variation is High

Two people in the same job can have vastly different outcomes based on AI mastery and adaptability. Our predictions are population-level averages.

2. Technology Progress is Uncertain

AI capabilities could accelerate faster (or slower) than forecasted. We adjust quarterly but cannot predict breakthroughs.

3. Policy & Regulation Matter

Government policies on AI deployment, worker retraining, and automation restrictions could significantly shift timelines.

4. New Jobs Will Emerge

While AI will displace jobs, it will also create new ones. Our focus is displacement risk, not net employment impact.

Bottom line: Use our predictions as a wake-up call to start preparing, not as a definitive destiny. AI mastery and adaptability can dramatically extend your timeline.

Ready to Find Your Year?

Take our 2-minute quiz to get your personalized AI displacement prediction

Take the Quiz